EARTH would like to
take a few moments of your time to introduce you to the Hong Kong
Language Needs Assessment Project (HKLNA-Project). EARTH is a private
Hong Kong research firm dedicated to better cross-cultural communication
in East Asia and education and language reform in Hong Kong. As you are
probably well aware, the Hong Kong S.A.R. government is in the process
of overhauling the region's public education system. English language
reform is an important part of that reform. EARTH would like to shed
some light on what successful reform might include. If you think you
are not affected by the reform process, then you are strongly
encouraged to read further.
After the graphs are downloaded onto your hard disk, adjust
the width of your screen until you obtain an aesthetically pleasing
arrangement of text and images. Clicking on the graphs will open your
browser to the corresponding tables and data sources from which the
graphs were constructed.
Educational reform is not so much about the children of today's
entrepreneurial, governmental, and familial elite, as it is about the
social fabric from which these and other children will someday weave and
mold the future of Hong Kong into a sustainable, prosperous, world
community. By the time a child has graduated from school his system of
values, social behavior, and conceptual understanding of the world about
him are firmly in place. How he relates to his peers, his ability to
submit to authority, the way in which he goes about solving problems,
and his ability to express himself are unlikely to change dramatically
thereafter.
Hong Kong's Inverted Educational Pyramid
In the bar chart to the right the distribution of public
expenditure on education across levels is provided for Hong Kong and its
principal trade partners, as well as Singapore. Each country is ranked
according to the amount spent on tertiary education.
Hong
Kong is at the bottom of the list because, as a proportion of public
expenditure on tertiary education, it spends the greatest amount. A
close examination of primary education expenditure across Hong Kong's
trade partners reveals, however, a rank order that is nearly identically
opposed. This contrast is crucial in understanding what is wrong with
Hong Kong's current system of education, and why Hong Kong's future
social fabric is seriously endangered.
Although Hong Kong is rather average with regard to the proportion of
public money that it spends on secondary education; like Singapore, it
demonstrates an overall inverted pattern of expenditure on education.
It is one thing to spend more money per student at the tertiary level,
it is quite another to neglect the primary level altogether! It is also
very questionable how much of the money spent at the tertiary level
actually goes into the education of Hong Kong's future leaders.
Government Expenditure on Education
The regional government is quick to indicate the large portion of Hong
Kong tax dollars spent on the education of Hong Kong's children, but as
a proportion of the total economy just how much is truly spent? Compare
Hong Kong's expenditure with that of its principal trade partners in the
chart below. One may argue that Western nations, whose social fabric
tends to be far looser than that of East Asian nations, require greater
expenditure on education at all levels. On the other hand, Japan and
South Korea enjoy much more tightly knit societies than their Western
counterparts.
There is a point where even the strong family ties of Chinese tradition
can no longer hold up against the social stress and alienation
associated with highly competitive markets and globalization.
In its January brochure entitled Education Statistics the Education and
Manpower Bureau proudly showed a rising trend in public money spent on
education. Unfortunately the overall rise is increasing at an ever
decreasing rate. The story does not end here, however.
Enormous and Increasing Income Disparity
In 2001 Hong Kong's top 20% earned nearly 20 times what its bottom 20%
earned for approximately equal amounts of time spent at work. This
discrepancy worsens for the top and bottom 10%.
Though this polarization of knowledge and wealth was probably
well-suited for an ancient agrarian state and colonial empire, it is
hardly appropriate for a modern, quasi city-state that depends as much
on the initiative, industry, and intelligence of its middle-managers and
common work force, as it does on its well-established families and
entrepreneurial elite.
In
an age of instantaneous telecommunication and increasing access to the
internet the potential for
everyone to access the same information
is rapidly increasing. Without proper education and appropriate
incentives, however, this productive potential can never be properly
tapped.
In Hong Kong not only are the knowledge and monetary incentives
distorted, but the distortion is becoming worse. The GINI coefficient is
a measure of the income inequity of a society. According to Hong Kong's
Census and Statistics Department Hong Kong's GINI coefficents for 1991,
1996, and 2001 were 47.6, 51.8, and 52.5, respectively. A low GINI
coefficient means better equality.
Educational Reform
So, what is the Hong Kong regional government doing to improve things?
Consider, for example, the distribution of UGC earmarked grant money --
namely, public money set aside by government to promote training and
research in specially designated areas of scientific inquiry.
Only 1% of all earmarked grant money goes to education.
Is it necesary to point out that increasingly advanced technology in the
hands of a few is more than just an invitation for political
oppression; it is a recipe for economic suicide. What about the
environment?
Hong Kong residents work hard, but how many of them actually have the
time, incentive, means, and opportunity to take advantage of the
knowledge that is now, not yet so freely, available to everyone?
Social Capital
What attracts our attention in the morning paper is not the presence of
social capital, rather its all too obvious absence -- labor accidents,
labor strikes, the unemployment rate, environmental destruction, drug
busts, white collar crime, the suicide of prominent social figures and
young teens, murders, and government scandals.
Though Hong Kong's crime rates are still low compared with those of its
major Western trade partners, Hong Kong generally ranks the highest
among its principal East Asian partners. The extreme inequity with which
knowledge and wealth are distributed in Hong Kong is likely a
significant contributing factor.
With the exception of Singapore, which has even more police personnel
per citizen than Hong Kong, Hong Kong towers over its Western and other
East Asian principal trade partners by a multiple of two. If this
is what makes Hong Kong a safe and productive place to live and work and
attracts capital from abroad, then perhaps we should reconsider. A
large police force can protect the wealth of those who have accumulated
it, but it cannot provide the skills, values, and industry necessary to
produce it.
According to the most recent report of the Hong Kong Commission on
Strategic Development, Hong Kong's leadership wants Hong Kong to remain
a first-class world city. How it will achieve this, one can only wonder,
if the issues brought forward in this brief report and on the
HKLNA-Project's website remain ignored. By way of example, when EARTH
offered to present a formal paper on the economics of Hong Kong's
English language industry before the Hong Kong Economics Association's
2nd Biennial Conference, it was accepted and then later rejected. Why?
Insufficient interest in the economics of education.
EARTH
By now you may be asking yourself what any of this has to do with
English language reform. Certainly the way English is taught, employed,
and understood in Hong Kong is much more a symptom of the problem than
its cause. Nevertheless, if English language reform is conducted
properly, it will not only provide a better basis for international
communication, but also redirect some of Hong Kong's already meager tax
dollars into other areas of education with much greater need
Hong Kong's Chief Executive clearly stated in the opening remarks of
the Commission on Strategic Development's report
Bringing the Vision
to Lifethat civic groups are welcome in Hong Kong. The
HKLNA-Project Fund can be just such a group, but its success depends on
your support. Please visit EARTH's fledgling website and see the
voluntary effort that has already been put into making Hong Kong a world
city of the future. EARTH is looking forward to hear from you.
Sincerely,
R. A.
Stegemann
Owner and Manager
hsmr@pacific.net.hk
East Asian Research and Translation in Hong Kong
https://www.hashimori.com/moogoonghwa/earth/index.htm
Click
on the HKLNA-Project's Logo for a direct link to the project's website